This pretty much sums up how I feel today….And you can quote me…

http://www.moviewavs.com/0085412111/MP3S/Movies/Austin_Powers_In_Goldmember/ilovegold.mp3

From Ag Web.com

Diplodia ear rot thrives in cool, wet conditions during the grain fill period for corn, making the summer of 2009 an almost ideal time for the fungal disease to thrive, specialists say. It’s caused by the same fungus that leads to Diplodia stalk rot, both of which can be a lingering problem, especially if you grow continuous corn. The rot begins as “black fruiting bodies” on husks, cob tissues and kernels, according to Iowa State University (ISU) Extension plant pathologist Alison Robertson. Left unchecked, it can create difficult harvest conditions by breaking down stalks, but more importantly, can cut yields by as much as 15% to 20% by lightening kernel weights and reducing nutritional value, Robertson says.

“Diplodia ear rot is first noticeable in the field by a bleached appearance of the husk. When you peel back the husk, you see a white, fluffy fungus,” adds University of Illinois Extension Integrated Pest Management specialist Suzanne Bissonnette. “The good news is that the Diplodia fungus will not produce toxins in the grain; the bad news is that kernels will be very lightweight, shriveled, and of very poor quality. Diplodia is starting to be observed and will likely be our most common ear rot this season.”

Though it doesn’t produce toxins in grain, the Diplodia rot can cause other lasting damage if the grain is not handled properly. The pathogen can “be a problem in storage if grain moisture is 20% or above,” Robertson says. Bissonnette adds that once corn in the field dries to 18% moisture, it’s no longer susceptible to Diplodia rot damage.

0928rot.jpg

“Ear rot fungi will continue to develop in the field or in storage at moisture above 18%. If dry weather is expected, you can try to save some drying costs and leave the grain to dry a bit longer in the field. If you have moderate infection, though, and wet weather is expected, harvesting and drying to at least 18% is probably your best option,” Bissonnette says. “Do you really have to dry to 18% moisture? Well, that depends on what you are planning to do with the grain. If you are planning on long-term storage, you actually should get the moisture down below 15% to 16%.”

The latter figures aren’t just for Diplodia, though, as other similar fungal diseases — like aflatoxin — can thrive in moisture conditions between 14% and 18% moisture, she adds. So, if you’re taking action to stem Diplodia damage, it’s advisable to take precautions against similar fungi, she says.

What else can you do to prevent Diplodia damage other than watching that moisture level? Not much, Robertson says. Talk to your seed dealer and think about changing your crop rotation.

“Options for managing Diplodia ear rot are limited,” she says. “Rotatino out of corn is recommended since the fungus survives in residue. Hybrids do differ in their susceptibility to Diplodia, so talk with your seed dealer.”

Even though options are limited as to what you can do if you have Diplodia, scouting for the disease is not too tall a task, Bissonnette says. A good time to begin scouting is when kernel moisture is between 30% and 40%, then test 20 plants at 5 different locations in a given field, basing those locations on a typical “zigzag scouting pattern.

“You can use either of two methods to evaluate stalk integrity. The first is to lightly grasp the stalk at waist level and push it about 15 degrees from the vertical,” she says. “A second method is to pinch the base of the stalk below the first node. Stalks that lodge or collapse when pinched should be marked positive for stalk rot.”

Bissonnette says stalk rot above 10% to 15% calls for early harvest before any further damage or lodging can take place. “You can investigate ears for ear rot just by peeling back the husk at the same time you are scouting for stalk rot,” she adds.

Courtesy of Indiana Grain
CFTC Rattles CME Wheat
by: Thomas Grisafi –
We at Indiana Grain have watched wheat slide this morning and it has brought corn and beans right down with it.
As reported by Reuters, a possible move by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to implement variable storage rates for the Chicago Board of Trade 2009 December wheat contract jolted traders Thursday and sparked heavy spread trading.
“It really took us off guard and creates a lot of uncertainty,” said one wheat broker on the C
…

New Oil ETF Emerges in Controversy
The creators of United States Oil (USO) and United States Natural Gas (UNG) have launched a new fund, the United States Short Oil Fund (DNO).
The premiere of DNO comes at a difficult time for leveraged and commodity ETFs, as regulatory uncertainty
…

Platts to Start Physical Commodities Index?
Energy and metals information provider Platts said on Thursday it was looking into setting up an index that would give investors exposure to physical commodities such as oil and metals.
“There is an increasing demand to have exposure in the physic
…

Frost Unlikely to Hurt Corn
With fall harvesting in full swing, producers across the United States report a corn crop for the record books because of favorable growing conditions and an improbable threat of early frost.
If forecast yields are correct, the 2009 crop will be t
…

Paul Tudor Jones Getting a New Neighbor?
It looks like Apple is setting up shop in the “U.S. hedge fund capital,” Greenwich, Conn.
AppleInsider noted the technology giant has begun building a retail store in the “classy, pricey destination.”
Like Silicon Valley, Calif., is to
…

Listen to the interview on CNN Radio Here…

http://thewallstreetshuffle.com/podcasts/092309-Seg2.mp3

Courtesy of GFMS….

Publication of Gold Survey 2009 – Update 1 Gold at Crossroads of Either Disinflationary Price Retreat or More Probable
Strong Price Phase thanks to Inflation Linked Investment Boom

GFMS released Gold Survey 2009 – Update 1 today, their latest report on the gold market, at a launch in London and, simultaneously and in association with the Denver Gold Group, at an event in that US city. The following details some of the highlights of the report from the briefing given at the London launch by Philip Klapwijk, chairman of the independent metals research consultancy.

A key element of the Update is the consultancy’s forecast for the gold price in the coming months, which shows that two quite divergent paths are possible. Klapwijk commented, “on balance, we’re still favourably disposed towards the price in the medium term. That’s mainly because we see it as highly likely that debt monetisation and ultra-low interest rates, especially in the US, will at some point feed through to a build in inflationary pressures. Throw in dollar weakness and disappointment over conventional assets as the green shoots argument withers and then gold well over $1,000 becomes perfectly feasible”. The Update did warn, however, that the path to this may not be smooth as a brief dip could occur in advance of longer term strength, with Klapwijk also adding that the recent spike could readily unwind as its foundations looked shaky.

The report, however, noted that it is far from guaranteed that the bull run in gold prices will continue. GFMS believe the basis for this still possible but less likely reversal in trend would be the various monetary and fiscal stimulus programmes failing to rejuvenate the world economy, feeding through to a disinflationary conditions. It was expected that its impact on gold would in turn probably be magnified by investors seeking out the security of US Treasuries, which would act to boost the value of the US dollar.

While inflation/deflation may be important for the future, the report believes that, in the first half of this year and in particular during the very early weeks, it was counterparty risk that investors feared most. Klapwijk noted, “it wasn’t that surprising that, in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and other financial institutions, people should choose to park some of their capital in gold very specifically because it essentially has no counterparty risk. Add in the dollar’s slide from December and equity markets coming under pressure as the world economy went into recession and that largely explains the leap in investment – and basis our World Investment series to record levels over 750 tonnes in the first quarter alone”.
GFMS are aware that some market observers may have felt that investment ‘under-performed’ in the first half, given that it failed to rally the gold price over $1,000. However, the consultancy believe this judgement somewhat unfair and that more emphasis should be placed on the amount of bullion the jewellery sector was buying; the Update notes that, in the first quarter, jewellery fabrication collapsed and was overtaken in scale by scrap, which boomed to almost the same size as mine production. The report lists two main reasons for this event, the onset of a global recession and currency weakness in various consuming countries translating into record local gold prices. Klapwijk added, “as soon as we saw, early this year, that countries like India, Turkey and Italy had become net bullion exporters, it was obvious to us that the rally should soon grind to a halt and probably go into reverse”.

GFMS report that a key reason as to why gold prices did not collapse after the rally topped out was the restrained nature of supply, with, for example, scrap retreating as near market supplies dried up and first half official sector sales slumping. The latter was believed to be of particular significance since, as Klapwijk noted, “not only did we lose the actual impact of the heavy selling that we’d seen in previous years but the low level of sales must have assisted investor sentiment and that was at a time when many could have cut and run if they thought the longer term outlook for gold was turning shaky”.
The last main area of the supply/demand balance, mine production, the consultancy feels to have been mildly negative for the price, with GFMS statistics showing a first half year-on-year increase of a respectable 7%. Its price impact was, however, mitigated by much of the rise coming from the ‘one-off’ of new project starts ups and many in the market were instead tending to focus on the difficulties in maintaining output in the more mature producing areas. The market also had to face the slump in producer de- hedging, although its price impact was constrained by it largely reflecting just the greatly reduced scale of the outstanding producer hedge book and not a shift by some miners in favour of fresh hedging.

Publication of Gold Survey 2009 – Update 1

Supply Highlights

• Mine supply in the first half of 2009 increased by 7% year-on-year. The growth was mainly driven by a rise in output from established operations in Indonesia, China and Russia, and supported by the onset of a raft of new projects, predominantly in Australia and Canada. Notable gains in west Africa were dampened somewhat by South African losses. Producer cash costs remained almost flat in the first half, halting the trend of strong cost inflation of recent years.
• Net official sector sales in the first half contracted sharply, by almost 75% year-on-year to total around 40 tonnes. The acute fall was mostly attributable to lower disposals from the CBGA signatories, as well as modest net purchases from countries outside of the Agreement. Sales were concentrated in the first quarter and the official sector was in fact a net purchaser in the second quarter.
• Global scrap supply surged to a record high of almost 900 tonnes in the first half of 2009. The majority of the action took place in the first quarter of the year, in reaction to high gold prices which reached record local levels in several instances. Distress selling, in reaction to GDP declines or slowdowns, added to the total. Significant gains in scrap supply were seen from the Indian Sub- continent, the Middle East and East Asia, whilst Europe and the United States posted new record highs.

Demand Highlights

• Jewellery offtake fell by almost 25% in the first half of 2009, to around 760 tonnes. Losses were recorded across the board of key jewellery fabricators, with India and Turkey registering the sharpest falls. China proved the exception, as its fabrication rose by 7%. High local prices on the back of a stronger US dollar combined with a grim economic climate to precipitate much of the global fall. The weakness of jewellery offtake in the period is highlighted by it falling below levels of scrap supply. The second half of 2009 is expected to register another fall, taking the full year total to its lowest level in over two decades. Industrial fabrication slumped by a similar extent to jewellery consumption. This was headed by the decline in electronics offtake, due to weak consumer demand and concerted destocking of inventory, and compounded by falls in other industrial & decorative, and dental demand.
• Implied net investment rose markedly in the first half to reach over 990 tonnes, an increase of more than five times over the first half of 2008. Most of the inflows occurred in the first quarter, as investors sought refuge in gold when fears over counterparty risk and the global economy remained rampant. This is in stark contrast to the 75% collapse in bar hoarding, driven by liquidation in India – last seen in 1980 – which occurred mainly as a result of price expectations. Demand for official coins, however, almost doubled, whilst offtake for medals and imitation coins dropped by almost 60%. Nonetheless, World Investment (the sum of the implied figure, official coin demand, medals and imitation coins, and bar hoarding) leapt by almost 180% year-on-year.

• Net de-hedging slumped in the first half to around 30 tonnes, leaving the book at end-June standing at just below 460 tonnes. This low net figure was determined largely by the limited scale of the outstanding producer hedge book, due to previous years’ heavy de-hedging. AngloGold Ashanti made the only cut of note, as it continued to restructure its hedge book. Fresh hedging, totalling some 20 tonnes, was seen by Catalpa Resources and Apollo Gold in the first quarter.
© Copyright GFMS Limited – September 2009.
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this document, GFMS Ltd cannot guarantee such accuracy. Furthermore, the material contained herewith has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient or organisation. It is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any commodities, securities or related financial instruments. No representation or warran- ty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained herein. GFMS Ltd does not accept responsibility for any losses or damages arising directly, or indirectly, from the use of this document.

Gold Survey 2009 – Update 1: In just 40 pages, Update 1 identifies the most important economic, sociopolitical and market- specific issues facing the gold market. The publication can be ordered from GFMS for £250 / US$460 / €350 per copy. For orders and to receive further product information please contact Elena Patimova – Tel: +44 (0)20 7478 1750, Fax: +44 (0)20 7478 1779, Email: sales@gfms.co.uk, Web Site: www.gfms.co.uk, Online Shop: http://shop.gfms.co.uk
Note to Editors about GFMS Limited:
GFMS is an independent consultancy providing unrivalled research into precious metals, base metals, steel and diamonds. The company is based in London, UK, but has representation in Australia, India, Germany, France, Spain and Russia, plus a vast range of contacts and associates across the globe. The team includes 23 full-time analysts plus four consultants in key regional markets.

Press Contacts: Philip Klapwijk or Paul Walker, GFMS Limited, Hedges House, 153-155 Regent Street, London, W1B 4JE, UK, tel: +44 (0)20 7478 1777, fax: +44 (0)20 7478 1779, email: gold@gfms.co.uk, web site: www.gfms.co.uk

Cocoa price surge signals bitter news
By Javier Blas and Jenny Wiggins in London
Published: September 21 2009 18:36 | Last updated: September 21 2009 18:36
Cocoa prices hit a 24-year high on Monday amid forecasts that consumption will outpace production in the crop year starting next month, raising fears that the cocoa market is entering its worst period of shortages in 40 years.

The price surge – likely to boost chocolate prices – comes at a sensitive time for UK-based Cadbury, which is trying to prove its viability as a stand-alone confectionery company after rejecting an unsolicited takeover offer from the US food group Kraft.

Kraft claims it will be able to manage high cocoa costs more easily than Cadbury because it is a bigger company, with $42bn in annual sales compared with Cadbury’s £5.4bn.

Kraft’s cocoa costs are estimated at 1.5 per cent of its total sales while Cadbury’s are estimated at 10 per cent, according to Morgan Stanley.

“Any particular commodity price change is less marked for Kraft,” the US food group said on Monday.

Nonetheless, traders said Kraft had hedged less of its cocoa needs than Cadbury, making the US food company more vulnerable to a short-term rise in prices.

Both companies decline to discuss hedging policies.

Andrew Bonfield, Cadbury chief financial officer, said last week at an investor conference that, if cocoa prices stayed at current levels, “there will be no choice but to increase the price of chocolate in certain markets around the world”.

The bullish market has its root in Ivory Coast, which delivers 40 per cent of the world’s cocoa.

After a poor harvest this season, traders fear that the country’s ageing trees will deliver an even smaller crop in 2009-10, in spite of favourable weather. Traders also said the El Niño weather phenomenon could hit supplies from Indonesia, the world’s third-largest producer, and Ecuador, the seventh-largest.

Meanwhile, cocoa demand is set to recover, growing between 1.5 and 3 per cent in 2009-10 after falling 6 per cent this season, creating a market deficit for the fourth season in a row, the most prolonged since the 1965-1969 shortages period.

“Chocoholics will be disappointed to hear that the long-run cocoa bull run remains intact,” said Luke Chandler, head of agribusiness research at Rabobank in London.

This bullish sentiment has filtered beyond the usual operators, bringing speculative investors to what is usually a dull market handled by merchant and trading houses.

In London, the benchmark second front-month price on Monday rose to an intra-day high of £2,055 ($3,334) a tonne, the highest since early 1985.

Traders worry that falling output in Ivory Coast will leave a lasting market deficit. Ivorian small farmers – among the world’s most heavily taxed growers – have neither money nor in centives to buy fertiliser or replant to increase output.

Cocoa buyers such as Nestlé are so worried that they have launched programmes to replant trees in a desperate effort to avoid a long-term decline in output.

Ivory Coast production “could fall by more than 100,000 tonnes in 2010 after a fall of about 200,000 tonnes in 2008-09”, the French embassy in the country warned this month.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009

By Myra P. Saefong
TOKYO (MarketWatch) — The December contract for gold futures climbed as high as $1,017.80 an ounce Wednesday in electronic trading on Globex. By late afternoon in Tokyo, it had eased slightly to trade up $9.10, or 0.9%, at $1,015.40. “Gold prices gained some ground above the $1,000 mark on the back of the weaker U.S. dollar,” analysts at Credit Suisse wrote in a research note issued Wednesday in Asia. “The market is still torn between positive fundamentals and profit-taking by some investors.”